Effects of the type and level of soluble and insoluble fiber on productive performance and the incidence of diarrhea in piglets raised under two different hygienic conditions.
Dietary fiber has traditionally been associated with reduced feed intake and energy digestibility, particularly in young pigs. However, research has shown that the inclusion of moderate amounts of certain fiber sources may reduce the incidence of post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) and improve the productive performance of newly weaned piglets. . |
Ingredients such as oat husk, straw, or wheat bran contain significant amounts of insoluble fiber, which may influence motility and transit time of digesta throughout the gastrointestinal tract, thereby affecting piglet performance.
|
Study
The experimental treatments in both experiments consisted of a control diet based on corn, soybean meal, and fish meal, containing 8.0% lactose and 2.2% crude fiber, as well as 8 experimental diets resulting from the combination of 4 fiber sources (straw, oat husk, beet pulp, and wheat bran) and 2 inclusion levels (2.5% and 5.0%). |
All diets were formulated to contain 2,500 kcal of net energy and 1.3% digestible Lys. The remaining amino acids were formulated according to the ideal protein concept.
RESULTS
In Experiment 1 (clean conditions), pigs fed the control diet had higher weight gain, greater feed intake, better feed conversion ratio, and lower PWD (P < 0.05) compared to the average of pigs fed the 8 diets containing additional fiber.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the inclusion of additional fiber in the diet increased PWD and reduced feed efficiency in piglets raised under clean conditions.
However, when pigs were raised in dirty conditions, no negative effects of fiber supplementation on productive performance were detected, although PWD remained higher. |
Consequently, the most appropriate fiber source and level in commercial diets for weaned pigs may depend on the hygienic conditions of the farm.
You may be also be interested in: “Dietary fiber and its effects on pig performance and welfare – Part I”