09 Jun 2023
As research advances on the requirements of phosphorus and calcium for broilers, new considerations regarding the utilization of these nutrients by birds are being observed.
In this regard, the recommended levels of available and digestible phosphorus by genetic companies and research centers (Table 1) show a trend of remaining relatively high in the initial stages and progressively decreasing in the later stages. The same trend can be observed for calcium recommendations as well.
Table 1. Compilation from FEDNA, Rostagno, and genetic companies.
Available phosphorus refers to the phosphorus that can be released in the intestinal tract, such as non-phytic phosphorus and phosphorus released by endogenous (low activity in birds) and exogenous phytases. The proportion of phosphorus in the diet that disappears in the small intestine is defined as digestible phosphorus.
Regarding the requirements, it should be noted that research in the field of epigenetics demonstrates that the utilization capacity of phosphorus in birds can be modified by varying the levels of calcium and phosphorus in early feeding.
Diets with low levels of calcium and phosphorus during the first 90 hours after hatching allowed for better management of phosphorus deficiencies in the growth and finishing phases compared to diets with higher percentages of calcium and phosphorus in the early stages (Ashwell & Angel, 2008). In addition to using tables from different sources, we can directly calculate the requirement based on equations that consider daily growth, age, sex, and feed intake.
As an example, if we base our calculations on the equation presented in the Brazilian Tables for Poultry and Swine 4th Edition (Rostagno, 2017) for calculating digestible phosphorus, we obtain digestible phosphorus values between 0.39% and 0.42% for starter diets from 8 to 21 days, depending on the sex of the bird.
It is important to consider that by the time the bird reaches an average weight of 3.0 kg, it has consumed approximately 17 grams of digestible phosphorus (equivalent to approximately 20 grams of available phosphorus), half of which is consumed before 28 days. Therefore, it is crucial to properly evaluate the ingredients in terms of their contribution.
Accurate evaluation of phosphorus digestibility also allows for cost savings and reduces environmental emissions.
This is not difficult for inorganic sources such as phosphates, but special attention must be given to plant-based ingredients in order to calculate the amount of phytic phosphorus in the diet and choose the appropriate phytase matrices.
When formulating a phytase, the dose and respective matrix should be considered, which depend on the amount of phytic phosphorus provided by the ingredients in the ration (Graph 1). Currently, formulating with 1000 FTU per ton of balanced feed in broilers is common, and the trend is to formulate with higher doses to maximize phosphorus utilization.
Graph 1. Phytic phosphorus content in ingredients (Rostagno, 2017).
Therefore, the proper evaluation of phytic phosphorus and its variation is essential for choosing the correct dose and matrix of the enzyme and to avoid providing more enzyme than the available substrate, as shown in Graph 2.
Graph 2. Contribution of available P from a 6-phytase (EC 3.1.3.26).
For example, a growth diet formulated with corn, soybean, wheat, and barley (Table 2) has a phytic phosphorus value of 0.26%. It should be considered that the latest generation of phytases is capable of hydrolyzing approximately 80% to 90% of the present phytate, which means that for this particular diet, there is a potential contribution of 0.20% to 0.23% of available phosphorus, which should be the basis for choosing the dosage based on the matrix for each dose.
In general terms, with 1000 FTU, we obtain a contribution of 0.19-0.20% of available phosphorus, which means that we can safely use this dosage for diets with 0.24% phytates or more.
It should be noted that these enzymes can also be used at higher doses of 2000 to 3000 FTU (referred to as overdosing) in order to reduce the antinutritional effect of phytates and increase diet digestibility. Depending on the pH of the environment, phytate can form complexes with amino acids or cations like calcium, reducing the digestibility of these nutrients and the phosphorus content in the complex.
In this case, the recommendation is to formulate with the corresponding matrix for the amount of phytates present, and the rest remains “on top,” a strategy that has shown performance improvements.
Other factors to consider are the speed of action of phytase in degrading IP6 (phytic acid), the range of action at different pH values, energy and protein evaluation in combination with other nutritional additives, and technical considerations such as particle size, mixing capacity, and thermo-stability.
Regarding calcium, in a conventional diet, the main source is calcium carbonate.
We must consider that the solubility of this ingredient affects the digestibility of phosphorus and the action of phytases, especially if there are high initial solubility values. Therefore, we must also consider this aspect when assessing the matrix of a phytase.
The solubility of calcium carbonate depends on its origin and particle size (DGM).
It has been found that in the absence of phytase, diets with high calcium concentrations (1% vs. 0.6%) result in decreased phosphorus digestibility, and the same occurs with reduced particle size (75 microns vs. 402 microns DGM).
Under this scenario, the addition of 1000 FTU of a phytase increased the digestibility of phosphorus and calcium, achieving the highest values with coarser calcium carbonate and the lowest total Ca values in the diet (S.W. Kim, R. Angel, and M. Proszkowiec-Weglarz 2018).
Regarding calcium level recommendations, we continue to talk about total calcium with research advances towards the next step, which should be formulating with digestible calcium.
The recommended values from various sources relate total calcium to available phosphorus in the range of 1.8 to 2.2 and total calcium/digestible phosphorus ratio of 2.3-2.4.
If we consider the calcium digestibility values determined for vegetable ingredients, phosphates, and carbonates with the addition of phytases, we can generally say that a diet with 0.35% digestible phosphorus could reach digestible calcium values close to 0.50%, resulting in a Ca digestible/P digestible ratio of 1.4 (Table 2).
Table 2 also shows the proportions of calcium and phosphorus in their different forms in a growth formulation for broilers.
Table 2. Recommended growth formulation for broilers.
We can also observe in graphs 3 and 4 that the majority of phosphorus contribution is provided by the phytase (approximately 50%) hydrolyzing around 80% of phytic phosphorus and by phosphate.
Graph 3 and 4. Contribution of available P in a growing diet.
As for the contribution of total calcium, calcium carbonate is the main participant (Graph 5), so we must pay special attention to the described characteristics of particle size and solubility. Generally, it is recommended to use calcium carbonate particles between 1000 and 1400 microns with a normal particle distribution.
Graph 5. Contribution of total calcium in a growing diet.
We must also consider that the use of additives such as calcium pidolate allows for increased efficiency in calcium digestibility and contributes to the action of phytases by reducing the total amount of calcium in the formulation.
In summary:
It is important to accurately assess the available and digestible phosphorus in different ingredients, especially phytic phosphorus in vegetables.
The contribution of phytase matrices at variable doses is not linear but follows the law of diminishing returns.
The amount of FTU to be formulated is variable: the dosage whose matrix adapts to the amount of substrate present should be considered.
Consider the matrix of the chosen phytase based on available sources of calcium and their solubility.
The use of phytase overdosing helps reduce the antinutritional effect of phytate.
Follow the calcium and phosphorus ratios, whether available or digestible, avoiding excessive calcium and paying special attention to the solubility of calcium carbonate and other soluble sources.
Source: This article was originally published as a Spanish content in nutriNews LATAM November 2022
Subscribe now to the technical magazine of animal nutrition
AUTHORS
Latest Anti-Mycotoxin trends in animal feeding
Viviana Schroeder
Methionine in Poultry Diets and Its Role in Antioxidant Defense – Part I
Tainara Cluffi Dornelas
Calf Nutrition in the Heat
Carolina Kyriacou
Palm kernel cake and meal
Alba Cerisuelo
Effects of Nuxasan 500™ on Broiler Performance and Intestinal Health
Supporting layer and breeder performance via trace mineral nutrition
Preview: 10th Revised Edition of The Nutrient Requirements of Poultry (2024)
Edgar Oviedo
Risk Factors in Hoof Health in Dairy Cows
Fernando Ignacio Castillo Ortega
Biomarkers of mycotoxin exposure in swine
P.D. Tassis
The Keys To Feeding Piglets Without Zinc Oxide
Gonzalo González Mateos
