Nutritional Gaps in Plant-Based Steaks and Cold Cuts

PDF

Are Plant-Based Steaks and Cold Cuts as Nutritious as Their Meat Counterparts?

Plant-based meats have made remarkable strides in replicating the taste and texture of animal products, from beef to seafood. But how do these alternatives stack up nutritionally? A recent study published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry reveals that while plant-based “steaks” and “cold cuts” can be similar to meat in certain aspects, they often fall short in amino acid content and protein digestibility.

A New Frontier: Whole Cuts and Cold Cuts

Beyond plant-based burgers and ground beef substitutes, the market has expanded to include alternatives resembling steaks, chicken breasts, and even sliced cold cuts like salami or bresaola (a type of cured beef). These newer products are gaining traction among consumers, but they haven’t been studied as thoroughly as burger-style options.

Understanding the nutritional differences between these plant-based products and their meat counterparts is crucial, especially when considering their potential to replace traditional meats in diets. Researchers led by Tullia Tedeschi aimed to fill this gap by analyzing the protein quality, integrity, and digestibility of various plant-based steaks and cold cuts.

Comparing Plant-Based and Meat-Based Proteins

The study, conducted in Italy, involved analyzing three plant-based steaks and three plant-based cold cuts, comparing them to veal steaks, ham, and beef cold cuts. Key nutritional factors such as fat, salt, and protein content were measured. Additionally, the products underwent simulated digestion to assess how well their proteins break down in the human digestive system.

Key Findings:

Plant-based products contained more carbohydrates, less protein, and a lower amino acid content than their meat counterparts.
Plant steaks were comparable to veal in terms of essential amino acid content and digestibility.
Plant cold cuts had less salt than meat cold cuts but contained fewer essential amino acids and varied significantly in digestibility due to differences in ingredients.

Variation Among Plant-Based Products

The study highlighted that the nutritional value of plant-based products depends heavily on the ingredients used in their formulation. As a result, their amino acid content and protein digestibility showed significant variation. In contrast, traditional meats within the same category exhibited more consistent nutritional profiles.

Implications for Consumers

The researchers emphasize the importance of careful consideration when replacing meat with plant-based alternatives. The differences in nutritional profiles should be clearly communicated to consumers to enable informed dietary choices.

Conclusions

While plant-based steaks and cold cuts have made impressive strides, their nutritional variability underscores the need for further innovation to match the protein quality of traditional meats. As the demand for plant-based options grows, these insights can guide both product development and consumer awareness.

You may also like to read: “Vitamin B12: What is it for, benefits and where can it be found?”

Source: Sara Cutroneo et al, Assessment of Protein Quality and Digestibility in Plant-Based Meat Analogues, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (2024). DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c08956