Feed granulation is a process that converts a finely ground mixture into denser granules, generally of cylindrical shape.
The reasons why this process is done are variable, however it is known that it improves productive performance (Figure 1), mainly because feed losses and selection of ingredients by the animals are both reduced.
The granule is formed by compacting and forcing the passage of particles through the holes or channels of the matrix, using a mechanical process (AFFCO, 2000; Figure 2).
Also, granulation increases feed density, which results in reduced transportation costs, improved farm management and better feed hygiene. It is also said to improve feed nutritional quality, however this effect has not been so clearly demonstrated.
Factors affecting the granulation
There are several factors affecting the granulation, however three of them stand out among the others (Behnke, 1994; Figure 3):
Conditioning
Feed formulation
Particle size
FEED FORMULATION. Characteristics of the raw materials
The individual properties of each raw material affect the granulation process. The water absorption capacity is one of the most important factors to be considered, since it positively influences feed conditioning and, consequently, the quality of the granule and the performance of the granulator, as mentioned above.
The water absorption capacity of raw materials generally depends on the moisture content when entering into the mill, particle size and particular characteristics of the raw materials.
The moisture absorption capacity will be lower the greater the moisture and the particle size.
Type of starch
In the case of cereals, the type of starch and protein affect the water absorption capacity.
In general, floury starch (wheat, rye, barley, oats) has a higher water absorption capacity compared with vitreous starch (corn).
Also, the more breadmaking cereal proteins are, the better water absorption capacity will be. This explains the better granulation of breadmaking cereals such as wheat and rye, compared with barley, oats and corn (Table 1).
Fiber contents of the raw materials also affect the moisture absorption capacity.
In general, fibers are good at absorbing moisture, but unlike starch, which does it quickly, they absorb moisture very slowly.
In turn, fiber absorption speed depends on its lignification degree and on the heat treatment it has undergone. The greater the degree of lignification, or the more intense the heat treatment, the slower moisture absorption capacity will be.
During the granulation process, there is little time for moisture absorption in the conditioner. Due to this, the higher the fiber content or the worse prepared it is to absorb moisture, the worse conditioning will be and, therefore, the worse granule final quality will be.
However, fibrous products, as well as dairy products, have an indirect effect on the quality of the granules, as they tend to reduce the performance of the granulator. As we will see later, a low press performance indirectly improves the quality of the feed to be granulated, due to the increased time in the matrix compression channel.
Table 1 describes the granulation quality factors and the production factors related to the main raw materials (Payne et al., 1994).
Fat content
Another characteristic that affects granulation is the fat content of the material to be granulated.
The fat content of the feed depends on the fat content of the raw materials and on the added fat, both in the mixer and in the press or conditioner.
Unlike the moisture absorption capacity, which positively affects granule quality and the performance of the granulator, feed fat content generally has a positive effect on the performance, but it has a negative impact on the quality.
Fat negatively affects feed conditioning due to its hydrophobic effect, which makes it difficult to have an easy mixture with the feed moisture.
However, better granulation performance is usually observed in diets containing high fat levels.
This effect is due to its lubricating capacity, which reduces compression time, which in turn negatively affects quality. This lubricating effect forces the distribution of the fat into four different moments: 1 – raw materials; 2 – addition to the mixer; 3 –spraying on the granulator press; and 4 – (if it is necessary to add more fat) addition to relubrication distributors, in the phase following press.
Among the raw materials that compose the feed, molasses has a different performance during the granulation process. Due to its viscosity and high sugar content, the adhesion of particles is facilitated, which could improve granule quality. However, this adhesion occurs very quickly and is enhanced after cooling, and this can substantially reduce the moisture absorption capacity of the feed if it is cold when reaching the press. Therefore, the negative or neutral effect depends mostly on the time lap between its dosing and the moment in which feed reaches the tablet press.
In general, if the molasses is dosed long before it reaches the press, either in the molasses mixer (Figure 5) or in the mixer, it forms small agglomerations with the other raw materials, which become cold and when they reach the conditioner the steam inflow is adversely affected, which makes moisture absorption difficult and, consequently, affects the conditioning.
If, instead, molasses is hot when added to the conditioner (Figure 6), no negative effects on feed conditioning are observed and it is possible to add higher amounts of molasses in the feed, which can be specially relevant for some ruminant diets.
In the second part of this article, we will explore other factors that affect durability, which includes all the aspects influencing feed conditioning and compression. Also, we will deepen our understanding of the influence of raw material particle size, moisture absorption capacity, the relation diameter/matrix compression and the performance of the granulator.
Subscribe now to the technical magazine of animal nutrition
AUTHORS
Latest Anti-Mycotoxin trends in animal feeding
Viviana SchroederMethionine in Poultry Diets and Its Role in Antioxidant Defense – Part I
Tainara Cluffi DornelasCalf Nutrition in the Heat
Carolina KyriacouPalm kernel cake and meal
Alba CerisueloEffects of Nuxasan 500™ on Broiler Performance and Intestinal Health
Supporting layer and breeder performance via trace mineral nutrition
Preview: 10th Revised Edition of The Nutrient Requirements of Poultry (2024)
Edgar OviedoRisk Factors in Hoof Health in Dairy Cows
Fernando Ignacio Castillo OrtegaBiomarkers of mycotoxin exposure in swine
P.D. TassisThe Keys To Feeding Piglets Without Zinc Oxide
Gonzalo González Mateos