Importance of Corn Quality in Broiler Diets

Figure 1. Layers and internal structure of the maize kernel (Merriam-Webster Inc. 2006).

The vitreous endosperm exhibits a protein matrix that is dense and tightly packed, posing challenges to its breakdown (Wang and Eckohoff, 2000). In this specific endosperm type, starch granules demonstrate a higher level of organization (Figure 2a)

Figure 2a. Vitreous endosperm. Sources: Holding, D. R., 2014; Sementes biomatrix

Conversely, the starchy endosperm features a matrix that is less dense and less substantial. Within this endosperm type, starch granules are arranged in a more relaxed manner, potentially enabling easier enzyme access (Huntington, 1997) (Figure 2b).

Figure 2b. Starchy endosperm. Sources: Holding, D. R., 2014; Sementes biomatrix

Both starch and protein digestibility can be compromised due to difficulties in accessing starch granules. The structural difference between starchy and vitreous endosperm, mainly characterized by the protein matrix profile, can impact the grain’s nutritional value (Tamagno et al., 2016), with protein content being higher in the vitreous endosperm (Gayral et al., 2015).

Processing stages such as grain drying can have an impact on protein solubility (Peplinski et al., 1994). Furthermore, during the process of feed pelleting, where starch gelatinization is a key goal, there’s a possibility of undesirable reactions like retrograded starch and Maillard reactions taking place.

Starch is a polysaccharide composed of glucose units, organized within the granule as structures called amylose and amylopectin (Weurding et al., 2003; Isaksen et al., 2011). In the case of corn, amylose makes up around 25% of the starch content, featuring a linear chain of glucose units interconnected by alpha-1-4 bonds.

• Amylopectin shares the same glucose composition as amylose; however, it distinguishes itself through structures that contain alpha-1-6 branch connections, constituting 70 to 80% of the remaining starch content.

Starch is classified based on its susceptibility to enzymatic hydrolysis into rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS), and resistant starch (RS).

RDS is readily available for absorption and is hydrolyzed after 20 minutes, SDS is the fraction hydrolyzed enzymatically within 20 to 120 minutes after ingestion, and RS resists enzymatic digestion in the small intestine, being fermented by bacteria in the latter parts of the intestine (Englyst & Hudson, 1996; Yue and Waring, 1998).

RS, in turn, can be divided into other categories.

The level of starch digestibility is a subject of debate; certain researchers reported values approximately at 85% (Garcia et al., 2003), whereas others attain values of 95% (Soto-Salanova et al., 1996). This divergence can be attributed to factors such as cultivar diversity, plant growth conditions, and spatial organization of starch polymers (Penz Jr., 1998). Nevertheless, this difference in values may be linked to the methodology employed.

Corn grain digestibility can be affected by the amylose:amylopectin ratio due to processing type, starch gelatinization, and retrogradation (Bjorck et al., 1994).

Research indicates that animals with rapid growth rates exhibit lower efficiency in starch digestion due to the birds’ voracity. This eagerness affects the digestion and absorption of nutrients by influencingthe gastrointestinal tract passage rate (Duke, 1986; Rougière et al., 2009).

Svihus’ studies(2011), suggest that there is an inverse relationship between feed intake and digestibility. Consequently, when feed intake is elevated, starch digestibility tends to decrease. This phenomenon arises from physiological factors involving the interplay between the quantity of ingested substrate by the animal and the inadequacy of endogenous enzymes for hydrolysis.

Another limiting factor for starch digestion in animals is the amount of endogenous enzymes which are necessary for effective starch utilization. If this process is not efficient, the bird is unable to fully harness its potential for energy utilization through starch hydrolysis (Sklan et al., 2003).

During the later phases, there’s an approximate 95% increase in pancreatic amylase, accompanied by a 200% rise in starch intake (Noy and Skan, 1995). However, this situation could result in a shortfall in the later stages where there’s a surplus of substrate but a scarcity of endogenous enzymes. Sakomoto (2009) indicated that the secretion of pancreatic amylase might encounter constraints both at the initial and final stages, potentially leading to a deficiency in starch digestibility.

Therefore, the elements that impact starch utilization encompass amylase secretion and the volume of ingested feed.

The quality of corn is crucial in formulating diets for broiler chickens, as not only is it regarded as the primary energy component in feeds, but its poor quality can also compromise animal performance.

• The sequence of production, grain processing methods, and the source of origin collectively possess the capacity to exert an influence on the chemical composition of  the corn grain and its nutritional makeup (Mazzuco et al., 2002).

Findings presented by Leeson et al. (1993) demonstrated variations in the energy content of different corn particles within the same harvest. Soto-Salanova et al. (1996) indicated that nutrient variations can occur among different batches of corn.

According to the studies conducted by Rodrigues et al. (2003), the digestibility of nutrients and the energy values of diets varied based on the composition of corn used in the formulation of diets for broiler chickens.

Leal (2012) evaluated the chemical and physical characteristics of corn with varying levels of fungal contamination (fermented/moldy) and whole grains, along with the effects of using these grains in broiler chicken diets.

Observations indicated an intensification of fungal infestation, a reduction in animal performance, and disruptions in the coefficients related to the metabolizability of dry matter and the apparent metabolizable energy within the diet.

The physical characteristics of corn, alongside its moisture content, the presence of mycotoxins, the proportion of fractured, moldy, decayed, or contaminated grains, along with various other aspects, possess the potential to alter the nutritional constitution of corn. As a result, this can subsequently influence the quality of feeds supplied to broiler chickens, ultimately resulting in a decline in their performance (Silva, et al., 2008).

This article was originally published as  content in portuguese on nutriNews Brasil 2023

You may also like to read: “UNDERSTANDING CORN VARIABILITY: PART I”